I like the idea of a readme.md - but it shouldn’t be exactly the same as the readme.txt: one documents the zip file available on the HL7 website, one documents the GitHub page. I’d be fine with a lot of reuse of content between the two, but they’re not exactly the same.

I thought we had shifted to recommending an “input” folder to align with FHIR, and I’m with John - I’d expect at a minimum the source files used to create whatever content is included in the latest published ZIP package (primarily MS Word source documents).



johnd@moreinformatics.com to cdamg@lists.hl7.org

Lisa,

 

A few notes on the PACP publication checklist:

 

• Your volume 2 is labeled as Vol1 in the header
• Your page numbers in footer don’t seem to be working
• Your github repo has a _Readme.txt inside the zip and a readme.md in the repo. I like that. I think we should probably be encouraging MD files since they render by default in Github. Could/should we add to our checklist? Should it be the same content as _Readme.txt?
• I think the Github repo should have a folder for the current publication (it’s fine to have backups, but all you have is backups). Others thoughts?
• I added the minutes page and check for SDWG approval. You linked previously to a draft of minutes in checklist.

 

Cheers,

John

 

From: Lisa Nelson <lnelson@max.md>
Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2023 8:09 PM
To: John D'Amore <johnd@moreinformatics.com>
Cc: Giorgio Cangioli <giorgio.cangioli@gmail.com>; cdamg <cdamg@lists.hl7.org>
Subject: Re: Notes on CDA Pharmacy Templates IG Publication Checklist Review

 

John, thanks for your review of all this. Yes, PACP IG is ready for CMG review.

 

On Tue, Apr 4, 2023, 5:34 PM John D'Amore <johnd@moreinformatics.com> wrote:

Giorgio,

 

A few notes for reviewing the publication checklist for CDA pharmacy templates

 

• I think the naming looks good (separate lines on cover for version and date, but both included in footer pages).
• Why are all versions marked as deprecated? Shouldn’t 1.2.0 for the active one? https://github.com/HL7/JIRA-Spec-Artifacts/blob/master/xml/CDA-pharm.xml
• The Github repo references examples and schema/schematron under folders not in repo

• Here is the readme https://github.com/HL7/CDA-pharma/blob/main/input/_Readme.txt
• You refer to https://github.com/HL7/CDA-pharma/validation/schema/CDA_Pharma.xsd but that’s not found
• You refer to https://github.com/HL7/CDA-pharma/validation but that’s not found

• Can you add the link to the minutes of the approving workgroup under step 9

• https://confluence.hl7.org/display/PHAR/Pharmacy+Template+STU2+-+CDA+Publication+Request+Checklist
• I unchecked this for the time being until it’s added.

 

@Lisa Nelson MSc, MBA Was the PACP also awaiting review? If so, I’ll work to review that in morning before call.

 

Cheers,

John

 

 

_____

 

John D’Amore, MS

President, More Informatics, Inc.

johnd@moreinformatics.com

m: (917)733-3735

 

***********************************************************************************
Reply and Reply-All will most likely send to list. Please verify address fields before sending!
Manage your subscriptions | View the archives | Unsubscribe | Terms of use | Feedback