hello all,<br><br>we have tried to discuss the request to merge MnM with FHIR-I. Unfortunately, we (Rob and I) did not have quorum. But we can provide the contents of the discussion that is documented in confluence for our today's call:<br><br>MnM has universal applicability and needs to be independent of any one product family. In general, a lot of the WGs fall into this category and should remain, e.g. Conformance. Assimilating infrastructural workgroups into a particular product family is not an optimal long-term strategy for HL7 (as new standards will surely emerge). It is our opinion that such WGs should remain independent.<br><br>Due to the tight timeline we have to convey a vote via email.<br><br>The Motion is to disagree with proposal as is.<br><br>So please return your vote to the list and/or me and Rob asap so that we can document that.<br>thx<br><br>best regards<br>Frank<br><br>--<br>Diese E-Mail wurde von AVG-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft.<br>www.avg.com<br>